"Upgrading Justice" - SCL Annual Lecture 2016 to be given by Professor Richard Susskind OBE FRSE - Thursday 6 October 2016, London: ""Upgrading Justice" - SCL Annual Lecture 2016 to be given by Professor Richard Susskind OBE FRSE - Thursday 6 October 2016, London
Introduction:
The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, The Right Honourable The Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd
Speaker:
Professor Richard Susskind OBE FRSE, President, SCL
Vote of thanks:
Mark O'Conor, Partner, DLA Piper UK LLP, Chair, SCL
The lecture will be followed by a panel session and Q&A.
Venue: Royal College Of Surgeons, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.
Registration: 5.30 pm
Lecture: 6 - 7.30 pm
Drinks reception: from 7.30 pm" 'via Blog this'
For researchers and students of cyberlaw and Internet regulation. The information law group in IT and IP Law, launched in 2013, led the EC-funded FP7 Internet Science and DG JUSTICE Openlaws projects. The group has strong links to the legal profession through board membership in the Society for Computers and Law and IFCLA conferences. Sussex ITIP Masters degree (LLM), PhD projects, Internet Law and IP Law courses.
Monday, 8 August 2016
Thursday, 4 August 2016
Negative energy – 2040 information law blog
Negative energy – 2040 information law blog: "The ICO is too close to their stakeholders. I’ve written before about the uncritical, supportive relationship between ICO and NHS England / HSCIC over Care.data. In the past few weeks, Ian Bourne, Group Manager in the ICO’s Policy Delivery team was bemoaning the future at a seminar organised by Privacy Laws and Business: “the ICO’s traditional ability to be flexible and business savvy will be under much more scrutiny from other DPAs“.
In other words, the GDPR’s consistency mechanism will stop the ICO telling organisations what they want to hear, and force them to take action on principles other than the Seventh." 'via Blog this'
In other words, the GDPR’s consistency mechanism will stop the ICO telling organisations what they want to hear, and force them to take action on principles other than the Seventh." 'via Blog this'
Thursday, 28 July 2016
Why Turkey issued a social media ban during a coup attempt—and promptly lifted it | The Daily Dot
Why Turkey issued a social media ban during a coup attempt—and promptly lifted it | The Daily Dot: "A source within Turkey’s censorship mechanism, who would like to remain anonymous due to government pressure, confirmed to the Daily Dot that Turkish ISPs received an email from the government’s internet authority (TİB) at 1:35am asking them to “urgently” lift the ban on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter.
This unprecedented turnaround can be explained by Erdoğan’s need to mobilize his supporters quickly against the coup attempt. Technology proved pivotal in getting his message across.
As an information security researcher known by the Twitter handle @thegrugq explains, Erdoğan had to use FaceTime to broadcast his message as his plane circled in the air away from the danger of pro-coup fighter jets bombing security structure in Turkey’s capital Ankara.
Later, tweets from his personal account and presidential account were further broadcast by tweets from official news agency and even from the national police force. All called for the nation to march towards city squares and defy the coup—which countless citizens did." 'via Blog this'
This unprecedented turnaround can be explained by Erdoğan’s need to mobilize his supporters quickly against the coup attempt. Technology proved pivotal in getting his message across.
As an information security researcher known by the Twitter handle @thegrugq explains, Erdoğan had to use FaceTime to broadcast his message as his plane circled in the air away from the danger of pro-coup fighter jets bombing security structure in Turkey’s capital Ankara.
Later, tweets from his personal account and presidential account were further broadcast by tweets from official news agency and even from the national police force. All called for the nation to march towards city squares and defy the coup—which countless citizens did." 'via Blog this'
Brazil prosecutor freezes $11.7 million of Facebook funds due to WhatsApp case | Reuters
Brazil prosecutor freezes $11.7 million of Facebook funds due to WhatsApp case | Reuters: "In the most recent decision, the court rejected Facebook's defense that the data of users was the responsibility of telephone and internet service operators in the United States and Ireland, which would require international cooperation.
Prosecutor Alexandre Jabur, author of the order, said Facebook has shown enormous disregard for Brazilian institutions, especially the courts, prosecutors and police in not meeting court orders.
Brazilian courts have shut down the popular WhatsApp messaging service nationwide three times since December.
In the most recent case last week, a judge in Rio de Janeiro ordered local operators to suspend service to WhatsApp across the country until Facebook complied with an order to turn over information regarding a criminal process in the greater Rio area.
On the same day, Supreme Court President Ricardo Lewandowski ordered the service re-established." 'via Blog this'
Prosecutor Alexandre Jabur, author of the order, said Facebook has shown enormous disregard for Brazilian institutions, especially the courts, prosecutors and police in not meeting court orders.
Brazilian courts have shut down the popular WhatsApp messaging service nationwide three times since December.
In the most recent case last week, a judge in Rio de Janeiro ordered local operators to suspend service to WhatsApp across the country until Facebook complied with an order to turn over information regarding a criminal process in the greater Rio area.
On the same day, Supreme Court President Ricardo Lewandowski ordered the service re-established." 'via Blog this'
Wednesday, 27 July 2016
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SAUGMANDSGAARD ØE delivered on 19 July 2016 (1) Joined Cases C‑203/15 and C‑698/15
CURIA - Documents: " Tele2 Sverige AB
v
Post- och telestyrelsen (C‑203/15)
and
Secretary of State for the Home Department
v
Tom Watson,
Peter Brice,
Geoffrey Lewis (C‑698/15)" 'via Blog this'
v
Post- och telestyrelsen (C‑203/15)
and
Secretary of State for the Home Department
v
Tom Watson,
Peter Brice,
Geoffrey Lewis (C‑698/15)" 'via Blog this'
TeleFrieden: Preliminary Summary of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Network Neutrality Decision
TeleFrieden: Preliminary Summary of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Network Neutrality Decision: "By a 2-1 vote, reflecting vastly different legal philosophies and regulator expectations, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected all challenges to the FCC’s Open Internet Order. [1] The majority deemed limited its review function and opted to apply ample case precedent that defers to regulatory agencies on both procedural and substantive areas. [2] In a nutshell, the majority opted not to second guess the FCC and expressed support for the Commission’s interpretation of law and its assessment of how consumers access the Internet and what they expect from service providers. [3] This decision supports a rare instance where the FCC substantially expands its regulatory wingspan, despite the general trend toward less government oversight. [4]" 'via Blog this'
EU watchdogs permit Privacy Shield to run for one year - BBC News
EU watchdogs permit Privacy Shield to run for one year - BBC News: "The new EU-US data-sharing agreement will be able to run for at least a year, European regulators have announced.
The Privacy Shield allows companies to transfer personal data from the EU to the United States.
EU governments approved the pact earlier this month, but 28 data protection authorities had yet to comment. They have now said they will not challenge the deal for at least a year.
This means that no legal objection to the framework will be launched until it has had time to go through its first annual review next summer.
The Privacy Shield replaces an arrangement known as Safe Harbour, which was struck down in October 2015 after leaks showed data was subject to US surveillance." 'via Blog this'
The Privacy Shield allows companies to transfer personal data from the EU to the United States.
EU governments approved the pact earlier this month, but 28 data protection authorities had yet to comment. They have now said they will not challenge the deal for at least a year.
This means that no legal objection to the framework will be launched until it has had time to go through its first annual review next summer.
The Privacy Shield replaces an arrangement known as Safe Harbour, which was struck down in October 2015 after leaks showed data was subject to US surveillance." 'via Blog this'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)